The FDA states that absolute risk reduction measures should also be reported to the public.  Here are the too-good-to-be-true relative risk reduction (RRR) measures of the Covid-19 vaccine clinical trial efficacy – Pfizer/BioNTech 95.1% and Moderna 94.1%, respectively.

Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccine’s Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) rates are 0.7% and 1.1%, respectively, indicating barely any vaccine clinical impact on preventing COVID-19. However, the risks involved are significant, and the effectiveness is nil.

Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) is ignored, though completely relevant. They do not want to put the numbers out to the mainstream because they are extremely low, as you can see.  ARR is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine. The ARR considers the whole population.  These absolute risk reduction measurements are clinically valid, regardless of the length of time of the clinical trials.

The absence of reported absolute risk reduction in COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials could lead to outcome reporting bias that affects the interpretation of vaccine efficacy.

Five doctors discuss the dangers of the experimental vaccine and the consequences of speaking the truth—censorship, de-platforming and silencing. After watching this, do you agree something very sinister is going on? Some of these doctors have left the industry and now battle for the truth to be exposed.

COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room

With the use of only RRRs, and omitting ARRs, reporting bias is introduced, which affects the interpretation of vaccine efficacy.10

There is a gag order placed on Doctors by the College of Physicians & Surgeons. The implications of censorship are profound. The lack of acceptance of vaccine injury reports submitted to the Canadian Adverse Vaccine Reporting Center is more evidence of manipulating the mass’s perception of the truth.